Living in your IRA-owned real estate

“I have an IRA invested in Real Estate. Now how do I take that real estate to live in, when I’m retired?”

Hopefully, that rental property has served your retirement plan well, not only appreciating in value over time, but also providing regular monthly cash flows over a number of years.

But what if you’ve decided you really want to retire and live in that house?

If the house was purchased by your Roth IRA, and you’ve held the Roth IRA for 5 years and turned 59 ½, it’s yours to distribute to yourself, with no tax or penalties.

But what are your options if your real estate assets were held in a Traditional account?

Certainly, you can distribute the house once you’re 59 ½, without paying any premature withdrawal penalties. But you’ll have to pay taxes on the dollar amount (in this case, property value) of your withdrawal, as though that amount was some cash added to your income in the year you take it. Naturally, since we’re talking about thousands of dollars, this may be costly. However, you have a few options:

1) You can distribute your IRA’s holdings a little bit at a time.

For example, at age 59 ½, you could begin distributing 10% of the property from your IRA each year. If you distributed 10% in year one of such a program, this would result in the property being owned 90% by your IRA and now 10% share is owned by you. You’ll need to arrange with the title company so that the ownership share is properly reflected accordingly each year. You’ll still be constrained from using the property personally until it is entirely distributed from the IRA. This will allow you to spread the tax burden from distributions over a 10-year period.

Keep in mind, this will change your monthly cash flows. You will personally be entitled to a direct 10% of income and responsible for 10% of expenses. These proportions would need to be honored since there are now two investors: you and your IRA.

2) You could consider converting a portion of your IRA (including that real estate asset) to a Roth IRA.

Yes, you’ll pay income tax on the amount you convert, but this may make sense for you, if you anticipate a number of years more of income to sock away, and for your IRA’s value to grow, before reaching age 59 ½. The point here is you may be paying some tax now on a smaller amount, instead of paying tax on a potentially larger amount down the road at retirement.

You could also convert a fractional share from your IRA to a Roth IRA each year so that at some point in the future your Roth IRA owns the entire property. Then, if you’ve reached age 59 ½ with 5 years in that Roth IRA, it’s available to withdraw free from penalty or tax.

3) You may elect to begin distributing shares of your property before retirement age by using the 72T method.

The IRS grants the 72T method (substantially equal payments) as an exception, which enables one to avoid the penalty for early IRA withdrawals.

The 72T exception offers a choice of methods, which you can use to tailor the timeline of your distributions. All are based on your life expectancy (or, if you elect, on the joint life expectancy of you and your beneficiary), and whichever method you choose must be continued for at least 5 years or until reaching age 59 1/2.

How to help a cousin buy a home with your Real Estate IRA

One of our New Direction IRA client representatives recently spoke with a prospective client who asked us to frame some ways for his IRA to help a cousin buy a home. The cousin has a good job, but he wasn’t sure about his credit rating nor did he have the money for a down payment. We spent some time talking about the ways that IRAs can participate in real estate and the IRS rules associated with that participation. Below is an excerpt that was sent to the cousin to get the ball rolling. If you are in a similar situation, perhaps this may help you get your thoughts together.

Scenario 1 – My IRA buys the house (the property would literally be deeded to the IRA). It secures a non-recourse loan to do this. Typically, a lender will want 30-40% down. So our max purchase price would be about $150K I am guessing. You would pay rent to the IRA or we can set up a rent-to-own agreement. This set-up, depending on the purchase price might leave me with little cash; so, you may need to pay for any unexpected repairs, which of course, would come off the rent or be recognized in some way. The advantages to this method is that you would not have any initial cost and would not have to qualify for financing. And, you could buy my IRA out whenever it was feasible for you.

Scenario 2 – We buy the house as tenants-in-common. My IRA and you are the deed holders, each owning a percentage of the house. This can be kind of fluid but the basic idea might be that I put in the ~$50K, and you come up with the rest. If you need financing for your part, the collateral for the loan would have to be something other than the house. It would also be helpful for you to let me know what your exit strategy might be. In this set-up, I really just contribute the IRA money in exchange for a percentage ownership in the house, but from that point, pretty much all the financial burden would fall on you.

Scenario 3 – I can simply loan you the money that I have available and we can set up the rate, term, and such in a way that is financially possible for you. Like interest only for several years, with a balloon payment down the road or some such. This set-up would mean that you are the deed holder, and the financing would be whatever you can work out.

Because you are a non-disqualified person to my IRA, we have a good deal of flexibility in how we set this up. In part, it will come down to how you want to play it and what your financial options are. One thing that I will mention is that my IRA’s participation always needs to be titled as the IRA. The important thing is to not put just my name on an offer or any type of legal document.

As a point of clarification, disqualified persons to an IRA include the IRA holder, their spouse, and lineal ascendants and descendants (and their spouses). However, the sides of the family tree, siblings, aunts and uncles, cousins, etc. are not disqualified persons.

Can I be the property manager for my IRA-owned real estate?

Many self-directed investors who call our office ask, “Can I act as the property manager for my IRA owned real estate?” The answer is yes, but there are several rules that must be followed in order to comply with IRS guidelines.

1. Do not handle the finances of your IRA owned real estate personally.

Example: Pay bills or expenses out of pocket, have rent checks made out to you personally, etc.

Facts: When investing in real estate with your IRA, you are not the investor. The IRA (a legal entity) is the real investor and title to the real estate is most likely held in the name of the IRA (Example: NDIRA, Inc. FBO Client Name IRA). This is a tough concept for some investors to grasp because it can be difficult to conceptualize who is really investing.

2. You are allowed to be the decision-maker.

Example: Selecting contractors, choosing fixtures, screening tenants, etc.

Facts: You are ultimately the decision-maker for all investment related decisions. However, IRS code prohibits you from personally adding sweat equity to the property. This means that you are not permitted to perform repairs or upgrades; they must be done by a non-disqualified person and paid for by the IRA. To the IRS, value-added services that are personally rendered constitute a contribution that cannot be taxed and are therefore disallowed. The bottom line is that your IRA must have access to an adequate cash buffer necessary to pay all expenses related to the property.

3. A disqualified person or entity cannot be hired by the IRA to manage the property.

Example: IRA Holder says, “Well, since I can’t personally manage the property for a fee, can the IRA pay a property management company that I own and manage myself?”

Facts: The short explanation here is that your IRA cannot employ an entity that is managed or controlled by you or your direct lineal ascendants or descendants. The IRS logic here is to keep all IRA transactions completely arms-length and not co-mingled with any personal benefit. To truly understand this rule, you need to continue reading more about “Disqualified Persons” under Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code.

4. You cannot take a personal commission as a real estate professional for brokering your IRA’s real estate transaction.

Example: As a real estate agent by profession, you’d like to help yourself by brokering the transaction and taking the commission for the deal.

Facts: As mentioned above, IRA transactions need to be made as arms-length investments, separate from any personal benefit. You are not permitted to immediately benefit from your IRA investments; rather, you are investing for the future. You can negotiate a change in the purchase price of the property that may reflect your services, but you may not take a commission personally.